@article{,
    author = {Wagner, Matthias; Engel, Florian; Klier, Kristina; Klughardt, Saskia; Wallner, Franziska; Wieczorek, Alissa  },
    title = {Zur Reliabilität von Wearable Devices am Beispiel einer Premium Multisport-Smartwatch},
    editor = {},
    booktitle = {},
    series = {},
    journal = {German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research},
    address = {},
    publisher = {},
    edition = {},
    year = {2021},
    isbn = {},
    volume = {51},
    number =  {},
    pages = {49-62},
    url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12662-020-00682-7#article-info},
    doi = {10.1007/s12662-020-00682-7},
    keywords = {Wearable Computing ; Wearables ; Fitnesstracker ; Methodenkonkordanz ; Goldstandard},
    abstract = {In view of their motivating effect, wearable devices promise to provide an important contribution to individual`s maintenance of physical activity and thus, to the strengthening of health- and performance-relevant parameters in times of digital change. The overall aim of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of wearable devices using a strong selling product of one of the markets key-players, the Garmin fēnix® 5. The reliability aspect of method concordance was identified as a research desideratum. To evaluate method concordance, stress level under cognitive stress exposure, energy expenditure during moderate running as well as maximum oxygen uptake during running of 30 male participants (age: 23.13 ± 2.5 years; BMI: 24.95 ± 2.45 kg/m²) as measured by the Garmin fēnix® 5 was compared with these parameters on the basis of the commonly accepted reference methods electrocardiography, indirect calorimetry and spiroergometry using Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCCLin). Following our results, the Garmin fēnix® 5 does provide a high precision when compared to the reference method electrocardiography and with regard to the measurement of the necessarily z-standardized stress parameter (p = 0.89). Moreover, indications for just moderate exact intraindividual concordance between the Garmin fēnix® 5 and its respective reference method indirect calorimetry and spiroergometry regarding the parameters energy expenditure (CCCLin = 0.43 [p = 0.52, Cb = 0.82]) and maximum oxygen uptake (CCCLin = 0.50 [p = 0.77, Cb = 0.66]) were found. Therefore, the Garmin fēnix® 5 cannot be recommended as a sufficiently concordant alternative to the established activity- and performance-related reference methods, at least when used for the first time.},
    note = {},
    institution = {Universität der Bundeswehr München, Fakultät für Humanwissenschaften, HUM 5 - Institut für Sportwissenschaft, Professur: Wagner, Matthias},
    
    
}